The phrase "amendment providing for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts when discussing changes or provisions made by an amendment to a document or law.
Example: "The proposed amendment providing for increased funding for education was approved by the committee."
Alternatives: "amendment stipulating" or "amendment allowing for".
In 1962 he offered the electors the choice between his resignation and acceptance of a constitutional amendment providing for the election of the president by universal suffrage.
As head of the coalition government, he brought about better trade relations with the Allied powers and procured a constitutional amendment providing for woman suffrage and universal suffrage in local and lower chamber parliamentary elections.
He secured voter approval of a constitutional amendment providing for appointment, rather than election, of judges to the Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, a change that was viewed as insulating the court from politics.
That's why I cheered this week when Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) joined a group of colleagues to propose an amendment providing for the election of our president by popular vote, not the electoral college.
The lower court also stated that the Maryland Legislature had the power to enact a statute providing for the reapportionment of the House of Delegates as well as to propose a constitutional amendment providing for such a reapportionment.
After more talks in South Africa, the ruling ZANU-PF and the opposition Movement for Democratic Change at least agreed on a constitutional amendment providing for a new post of prime minister, to be held by the MDC's leader, Morgan Tsvangirai.It will take at least another month for the change to get Parliament's nod and be enacted.
Finally, the last section, mirroring the approach of the Thirteenth Amendment, provided for enforcement.
Half of the Senate's 100 members run for re-election every three years; a recent constitutional amendment provided for four new seats for non-Muslim minorities.
Cruz also cited Tribe in his brief for District of Columbia v Heller, a landmark 2008 case in which the court held that the second amendment provided for an individual right to bear arms.
In rejecting Mr. Ghailani's claim, the judge said that while the Sixth Amendment provided for the right to counsel, the "right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them".
In that case, the court held that the second amendment provided for an individual right to bear arms and the late Justice Antonin Scalia proclaimed "handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home, and a complete prohibition of their use is invalid".
