The phrase "amendment presents" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the introduction or proposal of an amendment, such as in legal or formal documents.
Example: "The committee's report includes several key points, and the amendment presents a significant change to the original proposal."
Alternatives: "amendment introduces" or "amendment proposes".
In a decisive 6-to-3 ruling, the court reaffirmed the constitutionality of campaign contribution limits and exposed the emptiness of claims that the First Amendment presents an insurmountable bar to meaningful action by lawmakers to restrict the corrupting flow of money into campaigns.
For one thing, the First Amendment presents support for the argument that one should not be arrested, let alone imprisoned, for publicizing its speech -- in the form of these photographs or images.
The amendment – presented by two MPs for the anti-establishment Five Star Movement (M5S) – is understood to have the backing of Letta's government.
Their names, along with those of the cousins from Afghanistan, were on a list of 387 refugee children believed to be eligible under the amendment presented by Dubs to the Home Office on Friday.
Italy had already announced a one-year moratorium on site selection and the construction of plants, but an amendment presented Tuesday in the Senate would scrap all the rules governing their construction.
And then there was James L. Buckley, the former New York Senator and author of the first human-life amendment, presented to the Senate in 1974.
It is of the utterer most importance to have the First Amendment present, so it follows as: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances".
"By working together to tackle the erosion of the Fourth Amendment presented by bulk data collection," Kellegrew said, "people from across partisan divides are resurrecting the lost art of collaboration and in the process, rehabilitating the possibility of a functional American political dialogue denied to the people by dysfunction majority partisan hackery".
The use of humates as soil amendments presents an especially interesting case.
Sloppy, haphazard legislation does not help anyone in the long run: Reading the proposed slavery amendments presents all sorts of "what-if" scenarios; not only because of how different they were from the final draft, but because it is evident they were written in a state of unpredictability about the nation's future.
The Republican-controlled committee passed the plan, or budget resolution, which provides a framework for Congress as it takes up annual spending bills, on a vote of 23 to 18 after defeating the major amendments presented by Democrats.
