The phrase "amendment of requirements" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where changes or modifications to existing requirements are being discussed, such as in legal, technical, or project management documents.
Example: "The committee proposed an amendment of requirements to better align the project with current regulations."
Alternatives: "revision of requirements" or "modification of requirements".
As "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals" [ 28] already exist, a first proposal has been sent to the ICMJE to be considered in a future amendment of these requirements.
As applied to public utilities, the validity under the Fourteenth Amendment of the requirement of the certificate has never been successfully questioned.
Given the constitutional adequacy of the Goldstein affidavit in terms of Fourth Amendment requirements of probable cause and particularity, I conclude that both the search and seizure in Steinman's office satisfied Fourth Amendment mandates.
As long at President Bush operates unilaterally, in secret and outside the law, there is no statutory amendment or new set of requirements that will solve the problem or protect this country.
Where the materials sought to be seized may be protected by the First Amendment, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment must be applied with "scrupulous exactitude". Stanford v. Texas, supra at 485.
The amendment also rids gun dealers of requirements to report inventory data on missing guns.
Since Gov. Steven L. Beshear announced the plan on Wednesday, some constitutional experts have raised alarms over whether government backing for an enterprise that promotes religion violates the First Amendment's requirement of separation of church and state.
Mr. Perry addressed the crowd nine days after a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed against him by a national group of atheists arguing that his participation in the rally in his official capacity as governor violated the First Amendment's requirement of separation of church and state.
In a separate motion filed earlier this week, the group's lawyers sought immediately to stop Mr. Perry, who is contemplating a presidential bid, from either taking part in the rally or promoting it in his official capacity as governor, arguing that doing so violates the First Amendment's requirement of separation of church and state.
Instead, he relies upon two Supreme Court cases decided in latter half of the 20th century, in which the Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment's requirement of a "public use" to require only an ill-defined public purpose.
In a 2002 landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed Cleveland's voucher system, rejecting the argument that the program violated the First Amendment's requirement of the separation of church and state.
