The phrase "amendment in this case" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific change or modification relevant to a particular situation or legal matter.
Example: "The court ruled that the amendment in this case would significantly impact the outcome of the trial."
Alternatives: "modification in this instance" or "change in this situation".
Laws are made to last for decades, even centuries, with the help of judicial interpretation (in this case, the Supreme Court supported Title II classification) and legislative amendment (in this case, the 1996 Telecommunications Act).
Please step up and do the right thing and refuse to defend this unconstitutional amendment in this case and in future cases.
It's a conflict that's been raging for some time in various forms and jurisdictions, but with support from on high, the EFF as co-pilot, and the 5th amendment in play, this case could go all the way to the top.
But even though President Josiah Bartlet and most of his liberal Democratic staff on "The West Wing" are strong advocates of freedom of the press and the First Amendment, life in this case did not imitate TV.
And, as with all works of literature, the comics have spawned First Amendment disputes, in this case pitting free speech against the dangers of harming young psyches with depictions of things like crime and horror.
Brennan went on to focus on the particular reason for safeguarding First Amendment freedoms in this case: "Our Nation is deeply committed to safeguarding academic freedom, which is of transcendent value to all of us and not merely to the teachers concerned.
There are profound First Amendment implications in this case.
The Supreme Court struck down a law of this type in New York as a violation of the First Amendment in the case Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board (1991).
But is political discomfort about this choice of trial venues a reason to override the Fifth Amendment, in the case of a targeted American citizen like Awlaki?
However, the U.S. Supreme Court declared this part of the act unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment in the case U.S. v. Morrison (2000), in a 5 to 4 decision.
Levandowski has repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment in the case, citing the potential for criminal action that could lead to self-incrimination.
