The phrase "amendment in the third" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It could be used in a context discussing a specific amendment within a document or legal text, but it needs more context to be fully understood.
Example: "The proposed changes to the policy are outlined in the amendment in the third section of the document."
Alternatives: "change in the third" or "revision in the third".
Nor has the court explained how such a ban fits the general innocence-protecting idea that justifies the Fifth Amendment in the first place.
Conversely, it was of course Republicans still smarting from the New Deal that FDR had brought about who secured the amendment in the first place.
The Tory whips told their MPs to abstain after the Commons speaker, John Bercow, called the amendment in the first batch of amendments to the immigration bill to be debated.
They may also sound less like senators if they run early — before they absorb the Beltway vernacular that mistakes phrases like "amendment in the second degree" or "recommit to conference" for comprehensible English.
My interpretation is that the words 'a further amendment' in the fifth line of the Standing Order may be read as applying to more than one amendment successively.
That is a good result, when one thinks that the Council did not wish to accept a single amendment in the first instance.
Ultimately, the concept of custom can help guide policymakers and judges who must consider the scope, the limitations, and the continuing relevance of the Thirteenth Amendment in the twenty-first century.
Though defeated, the attempt to delay the process was supported by five other Republicans on the judiciary committee, which is considering amendments in the first stage of a legislative process that is likely to last until at least July.
The Government was against the Senate amendments in the first place, arguing that these competition issues should be tackled by the European Commission, not French institutions.
There is usually no RSI during the first year of clinical development of new medicines, unless the RSI contained in the Investigator's Brochure is updated via substantial amendments in the first year [ 6- 8].
