Both are cases of free speech: On private property, individual rights protected by the First Amendment do not necessarily apply.
For the rest of us, it's till death, 2020, or the Twenty-fifth Amendment do us part.
Hence, there is every reason to believe that the usual procedures contemplated by the Fourth Amendment do indeed apply to the press, as to every other person.
One may safely assume that most of the sixty-six senators — fifty-two Republicand and fourteen Democrats — who at this writing are listed as supporting the amendment do not seriously regard it as a good, let alone a necessary, idea.
But these protections, rooted in the First Amendment, do not exist in places like Britain, Australia and Singapore, where the burden is often on the author, once accused of libel, to show that a statement is true.
The words of the Fifth Amendment do not, in terms, suggest that government may compel men to incriminate themselves provided it promises that it will not prosecute them for the crimes revealed.
