The phrase "amendment decision" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to legal or formal changes made to a document, policy, or law.
Example: "The court's amendment decision clarified the previous ruling and set a new precedent for future cases."
Alternatives: "revision ruling" or "modification judgment".
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, amended a Second Amendment decision issued last month to delete references to the work of a controversial scholar.
Besides, the Constitution isn't going to be amended to overrule Citizens United -- any more than it was amended after a public outcry about another unpopular 1st Amendment decision, the 1989 ruling striking down laws against burning the American flag.
The study, after all, has already been published by The Times and other newspapers, resulting in a landmark First Amendment decision by the Supreme Court.
But the principles animating the Supreme Court's First Amendment decision are no less important in places where the Constitution doesn't dictate an answer.
The Supreme Court brought relief to newsrooms across the country yesterday when it handed down an important First Amendment decision in favor of freedom of the press.
European Union (approval of treaty amendment decision) bill Parliament's approval will be sought for the agreed financial stability mechanism within the euro area.
The court also issued a pair of Fourth Amendment decisions on Tuesday.
He supported his decision with citations to classic First Amendment decisions outside the realm of commercial speech, including ones on prior restrain and incitement.
Alert to the attention paid to First Amendment decisions, he would assign opinions ruling in favor of free speech to himself, hoping for good press.
"The more often there are First Amendment decisions in court, the more powerfully the message goes out to legislators to be careful".
Despite hundreds of Fourth Amendment decisions over the years, this area of the law continues to pose novel questions, and the justices retain a keen interest in it.
