The phrase "amendment applicable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that a specific amendment is relevant or can be applied to a situation.
Example: "The court ruled that the amendment applicable to this case was not properly considered during the trial."
Alternatives: "relevant amendment" or "applicable amendment".
The Heller decision expressly refrained from deciding that issue, leaving intact 19th century Supreme Court case law holding the Second Amendment applicable only to Congress.
"Today's opinion carries forward this court's practice of giving abortion rights activists a pass when it comes to suppressing the free-speech rights of their opponents," Scalia thundered in his characteristically mordant style, "There is an entirely separate, abridged edition of the First Amendment applicable to speech against abortion".
Mrs. Feinstein tried again: "Is the Fourth Amendment today applicable to domestic military operations".
The court upheld Gitlow's conviction, but perhaps ironically the ruling expanded free speech protections for individuals, since the court held that the First Amendment was applicable to state governments through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
This decision in Katz was later developed into the now commonly used two-prong test, adopted in Smith v. Maryland (1979), for determining whether the Fourth Amendment is applicable in a given circumstance: a person "has exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy"; and society is prepared to recognize that this expectation is (objectively) reasonable.
Originally, the Sixth Amendment was only applicable to the federal government.
But CTS and its supporters argue that the CERCLA amendment is not applicable to the current case because its text refers only to "statutes of limitation," and the North Carolina law in question involves a "statute of repose".
Its decisions have been vigorously criticized, on the one hand, for unduly meddling with state judicial administration and, on the other hand, for not treating all of the specific procedural guarantees of the first 10 amendments as equally applicable to state and to federal proceedings.
This review will (1) discuss grassland restoration in terms of ecosystem-level processes, and (2) analyze the efficacy of novel and easily applicable amendments (i.e. compost, biochar, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) to facilitate grassland recovery in severely degraded habitats.
The study was conducted in compliance with ICH International Committee of Harmonizationn) Good Clinical Practices and the Declaration of Helsinki, and its applicable amendments.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments, Good Clinical Practice, and applicable regulatory requirements.
