"amended rule" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it whenever you want to talk about a rule that has been changed or modified in some way. For example, "The government recently issued an amended rule that requires companies to provide additional safety measures for their employees."
The government said that it wanted to "prevent the waste of judicial resources" and that it was confident the amended rule would "fully address the court's concerns".
So Ms. Pearl, who is now 58, came up with this ingenious calculus of reading: "Now I have an amended Rule of 50: If you're 50 years of age and under, you follow the original rule.
In other words, for every situation where compliance with some rule would not produce the greatest expected good, rule-consequentialism seems driven to favor instead compliance with some amended rule that does not miss out on producing the greatest expected good in the case at hand.
The fact that the new or amended rule depends upon the social-fact source constituted or employed by the act of determinatio does not entail that a normative reason (an "ought") is being illogically derived from a bare fact (an "is").
Countries may ask other amended rules of their own.
Not all of the amended rules were influenced by incidents among the professional ranks.
Regarding this, "Rule of Case Reason" (2011) points out that the amended "Rules of Case Reasons of Civil Cases" should not be seen as equivalent to Item 119 of "Civil Law", which defines the conditions of admission.
Under the amended rules if jockeys exceed the allowance by one stroke they will be suspended, and if it is more than that they will lose any prize money.
What is the point of rule-consequentialism with its infinitely amended rules if we can get the same practical result much more efficiently with the simpler act-consequentialism? Rule-consequentialists in fact have an excellent reply to the objection that their theory collapses into practical equivalence with act-consequentialism.
And participate they did, though Rosenblum said it was too soon to tell exactly how much the amended rules changed the makeup of this year's slate of winners.
At the very opening of Congress in 1975, my colleagues and I announced our proposal to amend Rule 22, and threatened to force a majority vote to end a filibuster on the change if the minority tried to block it.
