The phrase "amenable to trial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to indicate that a person or case is open to being tried in court.
Example: "The defendant was found to be amenable to trial, and the court scheduled a hearing for next month."
Alternatives: "open to trial" or "subject to trial".
The oscillatory dynamics can be more physiologically plausible, more tightly linked to behavior, and more amenable to trial-by-trial analysis than conventional ERP measures applied to scalp data [ 37– 40].
Access effects are not readily amenable to conventional trial designs, because those designs generally take a population of patients accessing care and randomise them between different services, assessing average effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in those who have already agreed to receipt of services.
Although phase III randomized controlled trials are routinely conducted to evaluate new drugs, behavioral interventions are also amenable to these trials.
However, it is not clear whether this type of intervention is readily amenable to controlled trials.
The mdx mouse is an animal model that is amenable to preclinical trials regarding changes in the diaphragm muscle.
Additionally, interventions that are not amenable to randomised trials could be disadvantaged in terms of prioritisation, funding and implementation [ 12].
Considering that this compound may be amenable to clinical trials in combination with other anticancer agents, combinations of sapacitabine with several anticancer agents commonly used in practice, such as gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxel and seliciclib, a novel CDK inhibitor (McClue et al, 2002; Meijer and Raymond, 2003), were also explored.
Our aim was to identify the patterns of practice and areas of controversy that may need to be resolved and be amenable to prospective clinical trials.
With time series and cross-country comparisons, INFORMAS will become a critical data resource for analysing the determinants of changes in obesity and NCDs over time and also the impacts of national policies which are difficult to measure otherwise (they are rarely amenable to randomised controlled trials).
This is important because the increasingly competitive nature of health research funding in Australia means that evaluation and implementation scientists face significant hurdles to fund their research, which relies on complex methods and is not always amenable to randomised controlled trials.
Critics state that a rating system that is appropriate for clinical interventions may not discriminate evidence in a way that is appropriate for health system programmes or policies, potentially disadvantaging effective interventions that are not amenable to randomized controlled trials [ 10].
