The phrase "amenable to comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something is suitable or open to being compared with something else.
Example: "The two theories are amenable to comparison, allowing us to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses side by side."
Alternatives: "open to comparison" or "suitable for comparison".
The results are amenable to comparison with available sessile drop and fracture measurements.
Moreover, these differing conceptions may be incommensurable in the sense that they are not readily amenable to comparison or inter-theoretical translation.
These studies are amenable to comparison because they share a number of similar structural features: both deal with stochastic population dynamics in a scenario of abrupt environmental change and discrete adaptive steps.
Sometimes health professionals judge IADL performance based on informal observation of the patient, but these unstructured assessments are of unproven efficiency for predicting performance, and the results are usually unquantified and therefore not amenable to comparison across or within individual patients [ 9].
Long repetitive regions are more likely to be functionally relevant than short ones, in addition to being more amenable to comparisons between distant species.
The use of spherical harmonics allows the surface information to be encoded in a compact form as an orthonormal one-dimensional (1D) vector of floating numbers rendering it amenable to fast comparison.
However, their work corroborates our view: important metadata fields are free-text fields that are not amenable to efficient comparison.
Adding to the challenge, as for pathogenic mutations of large effect in the Mendelian epilepsies, some susceptibility variants may be novel and therefore not amenable to statistical comparison between cases and controls.
Different peptides seemed to show varying efficacies for inducing production of peptide-specific antibodies; however, these variations are difficult to interpret because the efficiencies of the gluataraldehyde cross-linking used to conjugate each peptide to carrier protein are not amenable to quantitative comparison.
The full cohort and cardiac cohort networks given here as examples of StarNet's analysis are not immediately amenable to quantitative comparisons.
ESAG3 was also not used because it is present in three positions along the expression site and does not cluster by position; hence, its phylogenetic signal was not amenable to positional comparisons.
