Sentence examples for ambivalent perceptions from inspiring English sources
The phrase "ambivalent perceptions" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used to describe mixed or conflicting feelings or views about a particular subject or situation. Example: "The ambivalent perceptions of the community regarding the new policy led to heated debates during the town hall meeting."
We do not expect a universally accepted definition of SE acts as a panacea but it could be the first step in overcoming the problem of ambivalent perceptions of SE.
It is difficult to provide a full explanation for negative, neutral or ambivalent perceptions.
Health workers and district managers have ambivalent perceptions of the role of TBAs and CHWs.
Our results thus reveal a novel cellular mechanism that may underlie the ambivalent perception and psychophysical effects of menthol and underscore the importance of tonic inhibition by GABAARs in regulating neuronal activity.
Perception ambivalence captured ambivalent feelings and reflections related to patients' perception of being at risk of CVD, on the one hand, and their perception of being healthy or sick on the other.
Negative, neutral or ambivalent organ donation perceptions often interlace between bio-ethical, organizational and social limitations.
His perception of the ambivalent role of the restaurateur – somewhere between pander and provider – was clear and forcefully expressed, sometimes too forcefully for his own good.
Our results show that perceptions of peatlands are ambivalent and many-facetted, and that they can be understood, metaphorically speaking, as good, bad and ugly at the same time: they can be seen as bleak wastelands; beautiful, wild nature and cultural landscape.
Community perceptions of PTSS were ambivalent at the introduction of the intervention and PTSS participation was often mistakenly associated with HIV infection by community members.
(id 7) Our analysis of patients' perception ambivalence furthermore showed that the conflicting (ambivalent) feelings seemed to interact with the patients' reflections in a concurrent process.
Patient characteristics and classifications are presented in table 1. Classifications were reached from consensus between the qualitative team based on rereading of the transcripts and identifying consistent differences in patient experience relating to their overall perception being positive, negative or ambivalent.
