The phrase "ambiguous on whether" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing uncertainty or lack of clarity regarding a specific issue or question.
Example: "The report was ambiguous on whether the new policy would be beneficial for the employees."
Alternatives: "unclear about whether" or "vague regarding whether".
(Citizens United is ambiguous on whether it applies to foreign companies).
The rules are ambiguous on whether the deputy leader has to remain in the cabinet, Lord Whitty is telling colleagues.
China has been ambiguous on whether it will support the EU, while Brazil said it was still in discussions.
On tuition fees, whereas some Lib Dems have sounded ambiguous on whether the mistake was breaking the famous pledge or making it, he's clear: "Breaking it.
Mr. Fuller's lawyer, Thomas A. Kenniff, said the evidence at trial was "ambiguous" on whether Mr. Fuller threw an "extraordinary" punch.
Even if the definition of sensitive information were confined to "national security" (and the green paper is sloppily ambiguous on whether it will be), we all know how this supposedly unanswerable phrase gets deployed to spare mere blushes.
Mr. Obama was still somewhat ambiguous on one of the most contentious issues in the national debate: whether Congress must establish a new government insurance program to compete with private insurers around the country.
For example, when a provided gene label is ambiguous, depending on whether the ambiguity could be resolved, CytoSaddleSum will relay a warning or an error message reported by SaddleSum.
Couple that with the organized effort under way to suspend AB32, the state's landmark law to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and Californians could face a double-whammy against renewable energy". result in lengthy and expensive litigation due to ambiguous language on whether or not a local government is the existing "sole provider" of an area's electric power.
For instance, Clinton now conditionally opposes the trans-pacific partnership; spoke negatively of charter schools in front of a teacher's union rally; and made ambiguous statements on whether independent contractors in the gig economy should have to be treated like regular workers (which could be devastating to a company like Uber).
More important to the future of Brazil, however, is the Green Party's ambiguous position on whether their concept of direct democracy supports the constitutionally guaranteed social contract featuring obligatory voting, or if the popular vote should be devolved into being just a matter of personal choice, a globalist idea du jour often bandied about at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
