The phrase "amazing claims" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to assertions or statements that are extraordinary or hard to believe.
Example: "The scientist presented amazing claims about the potential of the new technology to revolutionize energy production."
Alternatives: "incredible assertions" or "extraordinary statements."
He makes amazing claims, none involving sciatica.
It's a great way of anyone making amazing claims to show that they hold up and are not just a result of trickery or self-deception.
In the other camp are distinguished experts in cancer and screening technologies who believe that the amazing claims will turn out to be greatly exaggerated, if not a complete mirage.
But Clwyd tells me: "We heard it from a victim; we heard it and we believed it". This is all that Indict had to go on - uncorroborated and quite amazing claims made by a single person from northern Iraq.
So when the leaders of Silicon Valley start making amazing claims about something it pays to pay attention.
Named after one of the founders, Mark LeClair, the LeClair Effect involves "cavitation zero point energy and fusion" and some pretty amazing claims are made including "the underlying zero point energy mechanism of the LeClair Effect challenges the legitimacy of the first and second laws of thermodynamics, extracting energy from a quantum reservoir in amounts large enough to trigger fusion.
As if invoking Satan weren't bad enough, Carson resorted to bad puns to sidestep his scientific ignorance: he went on to say that he was planning a book called "The Organ of Species," which he said would "talk about the organs of the body and how they completely refute evolution" — an amazing claim that would require a rewriting of most biology texts.
As if invoking Satan weren't bad enough, Carson resorted to bad puns to sidestep his scientific ignorance: he went on to say that he was planning a book called "The Organ of Species," which he said would "talk about the organs of the body and how they completely refute evolution"—an amazing claim that would require a rewriting of most biology texts.
The notion that just one person didn't do their job and led to the biggest breach in history is quite an amazing claim and shows a fundamental lack of good security practices.
But that's not an amazing claim.
This followed with a back and forth that ended with Stein saying, "That seems like an amazing claim for a Senate candidate to make".
