am not superstitious

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "am not superstitious" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be preceded by a subject, such as "I," to form a complete sentence. Example: "I am not superstitious and do not believe in luck."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

I am not superstitious.

The New York Times

I am not superstitious, and thought nothing of it.

The New Yorker

"But I am not superstitious and he is certainly not superstitious".

The Guardian - Sport

I am not superstitious, but I can say hand on heart that no one has spoken about the French game once.

BBC

And no, I am not superstitious.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

"But I'm not superstitious," he said.

The New York Times - Arts

EXTRA POINTS The Jets are not superstitious.

The New York Times - Sports

"Fielders are not superstitious," he said.

The New York Times

"I hope you're not superstitious".

The New York Times - Books

He, too, maintains that he is not superstitious.

The New York Times

"I'm not superstitious, but I'm not dumb, either," Ryan said.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always include a subject pronoun (e.g., "I", "we", "he") before "am", "is", or "are" to ensure grammatical correctness in your sentences. For instance, instead of "am not superstitious", write "I am not superstitious".

Common error

Avoid omitting the subject in your sentences. While it might be acceptable in very informal speech, it's generally considered incorrect in writing. Always include the subject (e.g., "I", "he", "she", "it", "we", "they") for clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function is to express a personal belief or characteristic. However, the phrase is incomplete without a subject. Ludwig AI points out the need for a subject to form a grammatically correct sentence.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "am not superstitious" succinctly conveys a lack of superstitious beliefs, it's grammatically incomplete without a subject. Ludwig AI emphasizes the need for a subject like "I" to create a correct sentence (e.g., "I am not superstitious" or "I'm not superstitious"). The phrase appears mainly in news and media contexts. When writing, it's best to include the subject for clarity and grammatical accuracy. Although the source authority is high, the grammatical error affects overall quality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I'm not superstitious

Adds the subject "I" and contracts "I am" to "I'm" for a more conversational tone.

I do not have superstitions

Rephrases the statement using the noun "superstitions" instead of the adjective "superstitious".

I'm not a believer in superstitions

Uses a more emphatic phrase, highlighting a disbelief in superstitions.

Superstition doesn't govern me

This alternative indicates that superstition has no influence over the speaker.

I disregard superstitions

Expresses a conscious choice to ignore superstitious beliefs.

I have no truck with superstition

Uses the idiom "have no truck with" to convey a strong rejection of superstition.

I'm free from superstition

Suggests a liberation from the constraints of superstitious beliefs.

I reject superstitious beliefs

Indicates a deliberate rejection of superstitious ideas.

I'm immune to superstition

Implies an imperviousness to the influence of superstition.

I don't subscribe to superstitions

Uses "subscribe to" to mean "agree with" or "believe in", indicating a lack of agreement with superstitious beliefs.

FAQs

How can I properly use the phrase "am not superstitious" in a sentence?

The phrase "am not superstitious" is grammatically incomplete. You need to add a subject, like "I", to form a complete sentence: "I am not superstitious". Alternatives include "I'm not superstitious".

What is a more natural way to say "am not superstitious"?

Instead of "am not superstitious", a more natural phrasing is "I'm not superstitious". This includes the subject "I" and uses a contraction for a smoother flow.

Is it correct to say just "am not superstitious"?

No, it is not considered grammatically correct to say just "am not superstitious" because it's missing a subject. A subject pronoun is necessary to complete the sentence, such as in the statement "I am not superstitious".

What's the difference between "I am not superstitious" and "am not superstitious"?

"I am not superstitious" is a complete and grammatically correct sentence. On the other hand, "am not superstitious" is missing the subject pronoun "I", making it grammatically incorrect in most formal contexts.