am employed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "am employed by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate the organization or individual that you work for. Example: "I am employed by a leading technology firm that specializes in software development."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

I can't do that because I am employed by a university.

The Guardian - Money

As such, I am employed by the voters of Brisbane," she said.

The Guardian

(While I am employed by a defense consulting company, my research and opinions on air support are my own).

The New York Times

I'm a 31-year-old public sector employee and I am employed by a research organisation as a website and social media account manager.

The Guardian - Money

I voted NO on 16 because it's morally wrong, and I am employed by PG&E! ~ … suppose PG&E's lying face down, bleeding out on the asphalt?

University of California, Berkeley

Disclosure: I am employed by Sweetbridge, Inc., which is headquartered in Phoenix, AZ.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

AM is employed by MSD.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Most actuaries are employed by insurance companies.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Pyne is employed by the Liberty Motor Freigh Lines.

The New Yorker

She'd been employed by The Sun.

Independent

Before that, I was employed by New York City.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In situations where brevity is key, consider using "work for" as a concise alternative to "am employed by".

Common error

While "am employed by" is grammatically correct, overuse can lead to a passive voice. Actively construct your sentences where possible, such as "I work for" instead of always stating "I am employed by".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "am employed by" functions as a verbal phrase indicating a state of being employed by a specific entity. It directly connects the subject (I) with their employer. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is grammatically sound and widely recognized.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

32%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "am employed by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used verbal phrase that serves to declare one's professional affiliation. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in English writing. While alternatives like "work for" exist, "am employed by" offers a more formal tone suitable for professional contexts and academic publications. Its usage is prevalent in news and media, science, and academic domains. When crafting your sentences, remember that although the phrase is grammatically sound, overuse could lead to passivity, thus varying sentence structure with active constructions might enhance overall clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

am an employee of

More formal and direct, using "employee" explicitly.

work for

Simple and direct way to indicate employment.

am contracted by

Specifies a contractual employment agreement.

am on the payroll of

Emphasizes the financial aspect of employment.

am a staff member at

Highlights membership within an organization's staff.

am in the service of

Suggests a more dedicated or formal employment.

am affiliated with

Indicates a connection, which might be less direct than employment.

am part of the team at

Emphasizes teamwork and belonging within the organization.

hold a position at

Focuses on the job role within the organization.

am associated with

Indicates a general connection, potentially broader than just employment.

FAQs

How can I use "am employed by" in a sentence?

You can use "am employed by" to clearly state your affiliation with an organization. For example, "I am employed by a leading technology firm that specializes in software development".

What's a more concise way to say "am employed by"?

Alternatives like "work for" are more concise and commonly used in everyday conversations.

Is it better to say "I am employed by" or "I work at"?

"I am employed by" is more formal and often used in official contexts. "I work at" is less formal and suitable for casual conversations.

Which is correct, "I am employed by" or "I am an employee of"?

Both are correct, but "I am an employee of" is more direct and emphasizes your status as an employee.