The phrase "always underline" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when giving instructions about emphasizing or highlighting text in a document or written work.
Example: "In your essay, please always underline the key terms to make them stand out."
Alternatives: "consistently emphasize" or "regularly highlight".
"But the thing that would always underline everything," Mr. Pilcher said, "was she always had to be appealing.
"But I always underline that by asking the United Nations to take charge of this problem does not necessarily mean the United Nations can produce miracles out of a hat".
Barbera is all diplomacy when it comes to commenting on his rivalry with Toronto: "I always underline they are two different kinds of festivals; ours is a much smaller festival, and we have a reduced number of films.
Likewise another young woman who had chosen an informatics profession remembered: "What is just disturbing, is that … the teachers always refer to a man [as a professional] and then at the end: 'We are very excited that women are also present', they always underline this and that is sometimes a bit annoying" (ID_4329).
"What is just disturbing, is that … the teachers always refer to a man [as a professional] and then at the end: 'We are very excited that women are also present', they always underline this and that is sometimes a bit annoying" (ID_4329).
Always underline important words in your answers.
Throughout history, design values have always underlined a given architectural style.
His answer was yes, always (underlined), and the exchange is a poignant expression of distance and inadequacy.
Whenever I described these events, I always underlined the threats at their most extreme, even though I knew this confected rage would never result in anything.
His book describes similar projects at many other firms, always underlining their win-win character.Unlike some advocates of CSR, Mr Benioff says he opposes government mandates to undertake such activities.
Pairing those two composers always underlines the debt that Berlioz owed to Beethoven, but it also emphasises how startlingly original and radical his own take on the symphony was in a work conceived only three years after Beethoven's death.
