The phrase "always the same subject" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a consistent topic or theme in a discussion or piece of writing.
Example: "In our meetings, we often find ourselves discussing always the same subject, which can become monotonous."
Alternatives: "consistently the same topic" or "repeatedly the same theme".
Dr. Shelley Wepner, dean of the School of Education at Manhattanville College in Purchase, mentioned the oft-cited benefit of the six-day schedule: Having different classes each week on a day like Monday -- which often falls victim to holidays and teacher conferences -- is better than always having the same subject and therefore missing out on it more often.
Investigators from the community are used and the individuals are not always the same study subjects in nested projects within the HDSS.
Every night for two weeks, he and his friend and classmate, Alexandra Likovich, a young woman who was pining for early acceptance to Middlebury College, went for coffee or talked for hours, the conversation always returning to the same subject: What if he got in but she didn't?
"The competitive racing of fellow offices of the Department of Justice in the same subject matter always made me pull my hair out," said Alan Vinegrad, a former United States attorney in Brooklyn.
Such approaches are reminiscent of the way Hollywood always seems to release films on the same subject at the same time, a strategy that has an eye on the competition when it should have its eye on the customer.
Everyone was working on the same subject, so you could always discuss any problems very effectively, and I got great feedback on my work.
The reliability is the degree of closeness of the repeated observation on the same subject under the same experimental conditions, so the instrument is always the same.
DYS385a alleles, excluding those of identical arrays, were always larger than DYS385b alleles in the same subjects.
In 3P++ analysis (Equation 1), k 2r was fixed at 0.178/min, though k 2r was not always the same among subjects (CV = 19%).
If the estimated source localizations from MEG vs EEG were always the same for each subject, then the correlations would have been 1; if they are random, then the average would be zero.
