The phrase "always applicable for" is not entirely correct in standard written English.
It can be used when discussing rules, guidelines, or principles that are relevant in all situations or contexts.
Example: "The safety protocols are always applicable for any construction site, regardless of the project size."
Alternatives: "always relevant to" or "always valid for".
These models are either empirical models not always applicable for different sites, or they do not capture important physical effects like buoyancy phenomena.
Current researches have been focused on fixtures for components with regular geometry, the results of which are not always applicable for components with complex geometry.
Semi-empirical formulas are often used for wave overtopping assessment, but they are not always applicable for complex structures which exist in reality (e.g. a storm wall on a dike in a shallow or very shallow foreshore).
The advantage of BGK expansions is that they are always applicable for Schrödinger operators (see [600]) while the Povzner Ikebe expansion only works in special situations, but when it does, it provides a lot of additional information.
Even for injections in rigid and closed molds such as in Resin Transfer Molding (RTM), thin shell approximation is not always applicable, for example in the case of multi-layer reinforcements with flow-enhancing skin, for thick parts or when the top and bottom halves of the mold are not at the same temperature.
Although it has never been formally proven (and that it is not always applicable: for instance, when the trajectory is periodic or when the phase space is constituted of disconnected regions), the ergodicity principle is often invoked [ 41].
Conventional honey analyses are not always applicable and effective for determining the geographical and botanical origin of honey.
Respondents were asked to indicate if the grounds as redefined by the researchers were basically always applicable in the assessment of incapacity for work in their countries.
Furthermore, calculation methods developed for pure hydrocarbons are not always applicable.
However, assessment of renal dysfunction by traditional scoring systems (i.e., AKIN criteria) is not always applicable [ 40], and some patients require haemodialysis for reasons not related to creatinine levels and urine output (e.g., hypervolemia or acidosis).
However, genetic methods are not always applicable, such as when the candidate gene is essential for growth or the host organism is not genetically tractable.
