The phrase "always alleged" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to claims or accusations that are consistently stated or reported, often in a legal or journalistic context.
Example: "The defendant has always alleged that he was not present at the scene of the crime."
Alternatives: "consistently claimed" or "repeatedly asserted".
The funk legend will allegedly play at Coachella in April — Sly's concerts are always alleged until they happen — and a new record may follow.
Did Richard III, the last of the Plantagenets, really murder the princes in the Tower as his Tudor successors, including their greatest propagandist, William Shakespeare, always alleged?
Until shortly before Christmas the paper had always alleged that only one rogue reporter and a private investigator were involved in the practice, and the police had repeatedly insisted that there was no evidence available to link any other News Corporation employees with hacking.
"If employees don't lose a dime because they don't get paid for spring training," Miller said, "and owners have always alleged that they lose money in spring training, and you don't lose any games because record books never show them, it's hard to equate that with a work stoppage".
The I.N.S. always alleges that they're nationals of the country where they were born.
Philippe Sands, a law professor who is always alleging that Tony Blair is a "criminal" for overthrowing Saddam Hussein's genocidal tyranny, appeared undisturbed by the existence of actual criminals among his university's alumni.
However, always alleging budgetary constraints, CIS top managers put off this discussion about physicians' involvement until the implementation phase.
The vast majority of test results from the Ecuador trial support what the villagers in the former Chevron concession area always have alleged: Chevron contaminated their land, using substandard drilling practices to minimize costs and maximize profit.
While it is always tempting to judge alleged scientific misconduct with the benefit of hindsight, it is not necessarily ethical or legal.
In a case with such strong evidence, he said, "you always have to accuse the victims, and you always have to allege a conspiracy," and in this case the conspiracy would have to include the accusers, a fellow coach who testified for the prosecution, and law enforcement officials.
That prosecutor concluded that "where the most serious offences are being alleged it is nearly always in the public interests to prosecute".
