The phrase "although there were no significant differences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing results or findings that show a lack of notable variation between groups or conditions.
Example: "The study concluded that the new treatment was effective; however, although there were no significant differences in recovery times, patient satisfaction improved."
Alternatives: "despite the absence of significant differences" or "even though no significant differences were found."
People who received those notifications did significantly better at limiting their calorie intake than those who didn't, says Burke (although there were no significant differences in weight loss).
Although there were no significant differences between responders and non-responders in the antidepressive medication, this might have influenced the results.
Although there were no significant differences in speed of walking between the conditions, the 10° wedge and 6.35-mm control insoles were associated with varying degrees of discomfort.
Although there were no significant differences in body mass index in our PTSD and control subjects, it is at least theoretically possible that there were group differences in bioavailability of metyrapone.
For the H-Al/SBA-15, 1-hexene conversion and C10+ selectivity tended to increase with increasing pore size, although there were no significant differences higher than 7 nm.
Although there were no significant differences between the three groups in terms of their overall scores on the TCDS and TABS, there were significant differences in specific areas on the tests.
Although there were no significant differences in species richness, diversity and composition between the two development types, bird communities were very different in terms of species evenness, species groups and nestedness.
Importantly, although there were no significant differences in average crop yields between two water input levels (W80% and Wsat), the amounts of irrigation and evaporation under W80% treatment were reduced significantly by 71.9% and 36.2%, respectively.
Although there were no significant differences among NS treatments, a 25 mg L−1 NS pulse treatment tended to give the longest vase life and the best 'display quality'.
The brief exposure programmed the mouse to put on fat, and although there were no significant differences in caloric intake or expenditure, it continued to put on flab long after the chemical was gone.
Although there were no significant differences in the background clinicopathological features of the two groups (Table 1), the high-risk signature group had significantly worse RFS (HR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.14 2.75; P=0.01; Supplementary Figure S1) and OS (HR=2.30; 95% CI: 1.40 3.82; P=0.0008; Figure 4B) than the low-risk signature group.
