The phrase "although debatable" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to mean that while a certain opinion or point of view can be argued, the speaker or writer is not necessarily in support of it. For example: "Although debatable, I believe that we should move ahead with the project as planned."
Although debatable, tsVEP has often been proposed to reflect a figure-ground segmentation or surface processing [76], [77].
Although debatable, an association between atherosclerosis and human AMD has also been described [ 54- 56].
Although debatable, we believe it was reasonable to assume that the CO was zero in patients who presented with asystole.
Although debatable, in recent years MRI has been considered the most useful modality in staging of NBL [ 2, 4].
Although debatable, literature has noted that 'income-related inequality in SAH is unlikely to be biased by reporting error' and 'inequalities in SAH by income do have predictive power for inequalities in survival by income' (33, p. 1621).
Although debatable, routine echocardiographic screening after diagnosis of acute Q fever is not the standard of care in the Netherlands because no benefit was found in an earlier evaluation (26, 27 ).
The relation between prejudice and stereotype, although highly debatable, is explicitly stated by Allport (1954): 'The stereotype acts as both a justificatory device for categorical acceptance or rejection of a group, and as a screening and selective device to maintain simplicity in perception and thinking' (1954 192).
Although still debatable, the V3 region in HIV-2 may also contain broadly neutralizing epitopes [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42].
The Snowden disclosures have certainly forced more public debate of state investigatory powers globally, although it is debatable how robust this debate is able to be given the ongoing obfuscation and contradiction from governments and agencies around key issues such as the legality of encryption.
The Snowden disclosures have certainly forced more public debate of state investigatory powers globally, although it is debatable how robust this debate is able to be given the ongoing obfuscation and contradiction from governments and agencies around key issues such as the legality of encryption.
His function includes name recognition, high remuneration, winning journalism awards and possibly also journalistic credibility (although this is debatable).
