The phrase "alternative time horizons" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing different perspectives or approaches to time management, planning, or forecasting in various contexts, such as business or project management.
Example: "When considering the project's future, we must evaluate the alternative time horizons to understand the potential outcomes better."
Alternatives: "different time frames" or "varied temporal perspectives".
Alternative time horizons (8 weeks, 6 months) were examined in sensitivity analyses.
First, we considered alternative time horizons of 5, 15 and 30 years.
In discounting future benefits expected from long-term benefits of the proposed intervention (such as improved life expectancy), we will explore alternative time horizons (ranging from the period of data collection to five years, 10 years, 20 years, and lifetime), and we will use the standard discount rate of 3% for costs and benefits.
HF is a chronic, progressive disease requiring lifelong therapy and consequently the cost effectiveness analysis considers a lifetime time horizon, although alternative time horizons, including an analysis which modelled costs and outcomes only for the SHIfT trial follow-up period, have been considered in scenario analyses.
When considering alternative time horizons and at the same time omitting the impact of irreversible effects, we found that the irreversible effects of RA have the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness in the longer-term (49.6% in the 2-year analysis vs 58.9% over 30 years) and that the reversible effects are larger drivers of the short-term outcomes.
Alternate time horizons are assumed in sensitivity analyses.
Ansar et al. (2014) urge agile energy alternatives with shorter time horizons than conventional hydropower projects.
In sensitivity analyses, alternative discount rates (3%, 15%), time horizons (10 years, full cohort lifetime), acceptance rates for PrEP (40%, 80%) and condom promotion (40%, 60%), and higher rates of ART re-initiation for HIV-positive members of serodiscordant couples (same treatment CD4+ criteria and 50%,100% rate of ART-naive) were also investigated.
These included alternative assumptions concerning time horizon, key cost parameters, recurrence rate, utility value and discount rate.
These included alternative assumptions concerning time horizon, key cost parameter, recurrence rate, utility value, discount rate and simulation method.
The Markov model was used to estimate the clinical benefits in quality adjusted lifeyears (QALY) and the costs of the medication alternatives in the time horizon period.
