The phrase "alternative items" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to different options or choices available in a particular context, such as shopping, decision-making, or providing suggestions.
Example: "When planning the event, we should consider alternative items for the catering menu to accommodate various dietary preferences."
Alternatives: "substitute options" or "different choices".
Table 6 shows the results with these alternative items.
With more than 80 items in the EvoGrader system, many alternative items exist for pre-post testing.
Using alternative items, the estimated results by the LSDV method are highly consistent with earlier preliminary results.
One of the main attractions for online stores is that Syte.ai's search engine can help customers find alternative items if what they want is out of stock.
Additionally, alternative items to the ones returned can be offered to the customer, thus leveraging cross-selling potential as well as possibly increasing customer satisfaction.
Oak Brook, Ill.-based McDonald's, which operates 13,000 restaurants in the U.S. alone, is sensitive to consumer concerns, offering alternative items like salad and Diet Coke.
OOA substitution expresses the customer's willingness to buy an alternative item if the preferred item is not listed.
Alternative item response models that define developments on the basis of variable difficulty parameters are discussed by Glück and Spiel (2007).
For instance, computers support the creation of new alternative item types and innovative item formats (Sireci and Zenisky 2006); items on computer-based tests can be scored immediately to offer immediate feedback to the examinees (Drasgow and Mattern 2006); and computers also allow on-demand testing (van der Linden and Glas 2010).
For example, the computer can continuously monitor the psychometric properties of the items; the examiner can easily record reaction time if this is of interest; and the computer administration opens up a wide array of alternative item formats to be included in the same exam.
The alternative (item) normalised priority ((N_{ij})) is calculated as follows: begin{aligned} N_{ij}=r_{ij} /max limits _{k} r_{k} end{aligned} (2 where (r_{ij}) is the assigned priority of criteria ((p_{ij})) by any rating-based algorithm and is divided by the maximum value of the priority ((r_{k})) in the corresponding criteria ((p_{ij})).
