The phrase "alternative distance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing different options or methods related to distance, such as in travel, education, or measurement.
Example: "In our study, we explored alternative distance methods for delivering educational content to students."
Alternatives: "different distance" or "varied distance".
The alternative distance proposed in order to address this problem is a distance that takes the smallest number of logically coherent changes needed to convert one judgment set into the other.
For example, an alternative distance measure in the FCM can be considered: it has been shown that the Euclidean distance metric as employed in this study may not be robust to outliers, such as those originating from undesired interferences in the acoustic environment [59].
Main outcomes were also tested for alternative distance measures.
No changes were observed when analysing alternative distance measures (see Additional files 6 and 7).
> To assess alternative distance metrics, we compared SEN, PCC, and bp-distance.
Here, we propose an alternative distance measure, motivated by image processing and pattern recognition.
Pons et al. [ 24] introduced a model-based alternative to distance threshold methods.
We also examined an alternative measure, distance of mammography facilities in relation to a respondent's residence.
However, bootstrap support for this placement is low and conflicting results were obtained with alternative methods (distance and parsimony).
Since we are ultimately interested in exploring the characters associated with particular evolutionary novelties, we use a character-based alternative to distance based methods for the identification of orthologous gene regions.
We conducted sensitivity analyses of alternative buffer distances around the maternal residence, including two smaller distances (1 km and 3 km) and a buffer distance that is slightly larger (8 km) than the 7 × 7 square mile area shown to be optimal for estimating exposure in the Li et al. study (2005).
