Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "alterations were considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where changes or modifications to something were taken into account or evaluated.
Example: "After reviewing the initial design, the committee decided that several alterations were considered necessary to improve functionality."
Alternatives: "modifications were taken into account" or "changes were evaluated".
Exact(5)
At least 2-fold mRNA level alterations were considered significant.
Areas of GM alterations were considered tendencies if not significant.
In these and other examples of previous validation and use of copy number alterations as predictors of outcome and response to therapeutic agents, only individual alterations were considered.
Alterations were considered significant if it passed the following filtering criteria: (i) q < 0.25 (individual dataset), (ii) q < 0.05 (merged dataset), and (iii) concordance in 2 or more datasets.
In particular, the following alterations were considered based on raw copy number changes: whole chromosome gains or losses, chromosome arm gains or losses, high amplitude focal amplifications as well as subchromosomal gains and losses, small regions of gain or loss as exemplified by normal copy number variation.
Similar(55)
The accumulation of somatic ADN alterations is considered as the main contributing factor in carcinogenesis.
These specific skin alterations are considered to be mainly the consequence of the inflammatory process and not a primary event in the pathophysiology [1], [2], [3].
Such alterations are considered benign and reverse after a period of detraining.
Thus, any SLE LDG sample that had 18 or more copy number alterations was considered ∆CNVhi.
These multiple genetic alterations are considered to be a direct reflection of the multiple steps involved in carcinogenesis.
Epigenetic alterations are considered to be very influential in both the normal and disease states of an organism.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com