The phrase "alteration is considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the evaluation or assessment of changes or modifications in a particular context.
Example: "In the context of the project, alteration is considered essential for improving overall efficiency."
Alternatives: "modification is taken into account" or "change is acknowledged".
Therefore, the wettability alteration is considered the real reason for more oil recovery during the tests.
A formulation of a proactive jamming/anti-jamming game with intelligent players in an increased action space created by combining frequency hopping and power alteration is considered.
However, wettability alteration is considered as the dominant mechanism compared with viscosity reduction since there is no significant reduction in viscosity from 35 to 55 °C and even less change from 55 to 75 °C (Table 3). Figure 8 shows that the ultimate oil recovery was 1.6% IOIP using distilled water (Test 1), but 13.9% IOIP using 20-tdsw (Test 3) at 75 °C.
This is because the assessed epigenome alteration is considered to reflect a patient's life history, including exposure to environmental carcinogenic factors and how strongly the sampled tissue responded to the carcinogens.
Expressional alteration was considered to be significant only when ≥1.8-fold and equidirectional changes were observed in at least three of four patients (independent experiments).
For the most part, areas of loss or alteration are considered part of the history of the object, and the ARCP is mainly focused on halting disintegration in its tracks rather than reversing prior damage.
In other words, if P-value was <0.001, the sequence alteration was considered to be a real sequence variation, not an error.
A recurrent alteration was considered when two samples with CHD harbored the same aberration (hyper- or hypo-methylation) at the same CpG.
The genes whose expression level changed in between 5- and 0.2-fold alteration were considered "not significant (NS)" in constructing gene lists.
What could explain these differences is that calcium signaling ensues from channels and pumps that specifically regulate cellular processes controlled by calcium and many of these calcium toolkits exhibit specific tissue distribution and their alteration are considered as cancer signatures [ 42, 43].
The accumulation of somatic ADN alterations is considered as the main contributing factor in carcinogenesis.
