The phrase "alter subject" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing changes or modifications to a topic or theme in a conversation or written work.
Example: "In order to better address the audience's interests, we may need to alter subject and focus on more relevant issues."
Alternatives: "change topic" or "modify subject".
Citalopram relative to placebo also suppressed differences in heart rate associated with the viewing of pleasant and unpleasant images, but did not alter subject's subjective responses to emotional images.
However, we found that SU withdrawal for 8 weeks did not significantly alter subject weight.
This problem could be dealt with by a protocol that regulates the number and timing of blood glucose checks, but that approach also would alter subject behavior, limiting the utility of the control group.
Here, we provide behavioural data showing that the incidental presentation of aversive and appetitive conditioned stimuli can alter subjects' preferences in an economic task, involving a choice between a safe or gamble option.
Likewise, although we were not able to alter subjects' belief that global climate change had occurred in the past, different treatments produced enormously different impacts on subjects' beliefs concerning the validity of data suggesting that climate is changing again and beliefs concerning the severity of the threat represented by current climate changes.
Additionally, we show here that our prior finding that sleep deprivation on the first post-training night does not alter subjects' ability to find their way in the virtual town three days later was not due to a limited amount of training in the Orban et al. study [12].
Dynamic Internet Technology, a small company in Asheville, N.C., provides technical services to efforts by the Voice of America to get e-mail newsletters into China, using spammers' techniques like altering subject lines or inserting odd characters in key terms (like "June 3/5tilde 4/54," the date of the crackdown on protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989).
CGM use may also have altered subject behavior, with a greater impact at baseline when it was novel than at 16 and 32 weeks when it was routine.
The results suggest that altering subjects' expectations could further improve the validity of the double-blind.
We first measured subjects' ability to detect whether each photo had been manipulated by asking "Do you think this photograph has been digitally altered?" Subjects were given three response options: (a) "Yes, and I can see exactly where the digital alteration has been made"; (b) "Yes, but I cannot see specifically what has been digitally altered"; or (c) "No".
This demonstrates that the mood induction, but not ATD, successfully altered subjects' moods.
