Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Also, we used two larger fragments as control.
Also, we used the WCF typologies suggested by Ellis (2009).
Also, we used an objective measure, rather than patient report.
Also, we used boxplots to compare of the samples.
Also, we used pollen productivity estimates (PPEs) that are available for 13 taxa in this region.
Also, we used DECAS, a personality inventory, which evaluates the dimensions of the Big Five model.
Also we used various algorithms for processing data like stemming, TF-IDF algorithm and cosine similarity.
Also, we used multi-modal PFC/ICG nanoemulsions to indentify sentinel lymph nodes.
Also, we used a small number of samples (one hundred samples).
Also we used weight matrix with ontology to evaluate proof questions to ameliorate the evaluation.
Also, we used public corpus and hence our results can be reproduced.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com