We also included values using the data-derived formula for this specific population to illustrate how values from this method compare to the traditional formulas [ 11].
The experimental results are also compared with predicted values using the available equation in Eurocode 2 and an equation published by a previous researcher.
We also corrected the p-value using the FDR method [ 51] as implemented in R (http://www.R-project.org).org
We took P<0.05 as the initial level of statistical significance but, for those comparisons without a prior hypothesis, we also adjusted the probability values using the Bonferroni correction to allow for multiple comparisons.
We also calculated the mean Ct values using the above four concentrations of genomic DNA as template in both quadruplex and simplex PCR systems.
Erythrocyte indices were also calculated from the above haematological values using the following formulas.
While the aim of the study was to elicit preference values using the TTO approach, values were also elicited using the SG approach.
This test result will be contrasted to that obtained by comparing the two groups without imputed values also using the non-parametric test.
The values of QMSP that were obtained from the positive control were also normalized using the value of β- actin.
Here, the acceptance threshold was set to a value, for which the F-measure was maximal (precision and recall values are also quoted using the same threshold).
A database of mathematical relations of residual stress values was also developed using the response surface methodology.
