Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Levene's test also indicated a significant difference in variance in the subgroups, F 1, 391)=33.80, p<0.001.
An ICC of 0.088 also indicated a significant difference in the time required to measure whole-liver volumes using the two techniques [ 11].
Similar(57)
An asterisk indicates a significant difference in medians was found between the two sets.
*A value of < 0.05 indicates a significant difference in means.
Individual training day analyses also indicated a significant group effect in error difference (T2 T1) on Day 2 (F[1,13] = 6.824, p = 0.0215, ANOVA) relative to sham (Fig. 2h, right).
Different letters in each column indicate a significant difference (p<0.05).
Different letters in each row indicate a significant difference (p<0.05).
*Values in boldface indicate a significant difference.
P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference.
*P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.
The ANOSIM also indicated that significant differences in attached microbial community structures existed between the two sampling times (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com