The phrase "already recognized to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where something has been acknowledged or accepted, but the phrase itself is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The findings were already recognized to be significant by the scientific community."
Alternatives: "already acknowledged as" or "already accepted as".
The human bones, already recognized to be from at least two individuals, revealed fewer secrets.
Our analysis presents some back-of-the-envelope estimates that indicate that this longevity risk, when aggregated over all individuals, could make the global cost of aging -- already recognized to be very large -- some 50percentt larger still if people live just three years longer than currently expected.
These include the majority of Tweedle genes, which were already recognized to occur in clusters [9].
In accordance with previous studies, many genes (19 out of 127) belonging to the SOP enriched genes identified in our study have been already recognized to be SOP specific.
Actually, the distinction between these 2 arenas is already recognized to some extent in standard terminology.
The first description of STAT3 in 1994 [ 3] raised suspicion in the direction of cancer because IL-6 and EGF, already recognized to have cancer connections, were the originally recognized ligands that activated the STAT3 homodimer.
The DMH-RPa connection has already been recognized to be important in the regulation of BAT thermogenesis in response to leptin (Zhang et al., 2011).
In what follows, we won't question DNA barcoding first objective (i.e. to assign unknown specimens to already recognized species, thanks to a DNA-library of named specimens).
In an editorial published twelve years ago, Kanis et al already recognized the need "to rethink vertebral osteoporosis and to focus more closely than hitherto on the quality of life of these patients" [ 14].
And while Nasri was signed for a comparably sizeable fee of £12 million (nearly $20 million) from Marseille as a player already recognized by many to be on his way up, his time under Wenger has been of undeniable benefit to his game.
Lawyers for the defendants in the new Supreme Court case, Briscoe v. Virginia, No. 07-11191, acknowledged that the Melendez-Diaz decision "creates some additional cost" in states that had not already recognized a right to live testimony.
