already has an arraignment

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "already has an arraignment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to indicate that a person has already been formally charged and brought before a court. Example: "The defendant already has an arraignment scheduled for next week to address the charges against him."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Mr Bieber already has an arraignment set for 14 February, but he is not required to be present under Florida.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

It already has a name.

The New Yorker

She already has a baby.

The New Yorker

He already has a camera".

The New York Times - Tech

This has already had an effect.

The Economist

The actions have already had an effect.

The New York Times

"He already had an MBE.

BBC

"I already have a partner".

The New Yorker

"You already have a guy".

The New Yorker

I already have a brand.

The New York Times

I already had a salad".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "already has an arraignment" to clearly and concisely indicate that a person has a scheduled court appearance to hear and respond to charges. This phrase is particularly useful in legal reporting and formal communication.

Common error

Avoid using "already has an arraignment" when referring to the trial phase. The arraignment is the initial court appearance where charges are presented, not the trial where evidence is presented and a verdict is reached.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "already has an arraignment" functions as a statement of fact, indicating that a person is scheduled to appear in court to hear the charges against them. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability. The phrase is used to convey information about the legal status of an individual.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "already has an arraignment" is a grammatically correct and usable expression, as confirmed by Ludwig, primarily used in news and media to report on legal proceedings. It concisely indicates that an individual has a scheduled court appearance for the arraignment phase. While rare in occurrence, its function is to inform about a specific step in the legal process. Alternative phrasings, such as "has a scheduled arraignment" or "is set to be arraigned", can offer subtle shifts in emphasis. It's essential to distinguish "arraignment" from "trial" to maintain accuracy in legal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has a scheduled arraignment

Replaces "already" with "scheduled" to emphasize the fixed date.

an arraignment is scheduled

Shifts focus to the arraignment itself being scheduled, rather than the person.

is set to be arraigned

Changes the structure to emphasize the person's upcoming arraignment.

will be arraigned soon

Emphasizes the imminence of the arraignment.

faces an upcoming arraignment

Focuses on the person confronting the arraignment process.

an arraignment is pending

Indicates that the arraignment is awaiting to be held.

an arraignment is anticipated

Suggests the arraignment is expected but not definitely scheduled.

has an impending arraignment

Emphasizes the nearness of the arraignment.

awaits an arraignment

Highlights the state of waiting for the arraignment.

is awaiting arraignment

Similar to awaits, but uses a continuous tense.

FAQs

How is "already has an arraignment" used in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, "already has an arraignment" indicates that a person has been formally charged and brought before a court to enter a plea. It signifies a specific stage in the legal process has been reached.

What can I say instead of "already has an arraignment"?

You can use alternatives like "has a scheduled arraignment", "is set to be arraigned", or "faces an upcoming arraignment" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "already has an arraignment" in informal settings?

While grammatically correct, "already has an arraignment" is typically used in legal reporting or formal communication. In informal settings, simpler phrases like "has a court date" might be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "already has an arraignment" and "will have an arraignment"?

"Already has an arraignment" implies the arraignment is scheduled. "Will have an arraignment" suggests the arraignment is pending scheduling but has not yet occurred. Therefore, the former emphasizes a confirmed event, while the latter indicates a future event.