Sentence examples for already acknowledged in from inspiring English sources

Officials have already acknowledged in passing the existence of the facility in central Nevada where the government is believed to test intelligence tools and weapons.

The Labour leader has already acknowledged in a speech in January that the economic recovery means living standards are likely to rise this year, but in a Guardian article he contends it will be the rich who will benefit most.

Even if this was already acknowledged in the 1940's, the geo-location of genetic data in ecology and agriculture for further spatial analysis: spatial genetic, is still a recent concept [17].

Inhibiting angiogenesis has become a challenge in the development of a totally new class of anticancer drugs as was already acknowledged in 1971 by Folkman (1971).

The importance of exercise and physical activity was already acknowledged in the earlier clinical practice guideline from 2000 [ 4], but the recommendations in the current guideline are more specific.

11 The existence of mixed states is already acknowledged in DSM 5 as exemplified by the proposal that a diagnosis termed 'mixed anxiety depression' be added to the mood disorders section.

We have included this new information and it strengthens our idea that REST targets in ESCs are associated with H3K4me3, as this reviewer already acknowledges in point 7 below.

The company had already acknowledged back in January that it had new, more robust parental control features in the works, following an open letter posted by two large Apple shareholder groups, Jana Partners LLC and the California State Teachers Retirement Systemm.

Bishop Frank J. Rodimer, the head of the Diocese of Paterson who has already acknowledged missteps in his handling of allegations against Mr. Hanley, met briefly with the group.

Penn has already acknowledged "weaknesses" in its oversight of the trial, but says they "did not contribute to Jesse's death".

However, this was beyond the purposes of our research and we have already acknowledged this in the first version of the paper with the following paragraph of the Discussion section: "Sixth, the quality (however one defines "quality" in this context) of publications is not taken in account.