Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "alphabets with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a collection or set of alphabets in conjunction with something else, such as a specific context or feature.
Example: "The book includes alphabets with unique symbols that represent different languages."
Alternatives: "alphabets containing" or "alphabets featuring".
Exact(13)
Alphabets with same letters are non-significant at p = < 0.05.
Experiments revealed that our system was able to recognize the 30 Arabic manual alphabets with an accuracy of 93.55%.
This paper also found that the reduced alphabets with size 13 simplify PSSM structures efficiently while reserving its maximal information.
b Variability in dehydrogenase activity as quantified by reduction in TTC levels over control showing differences in seed viability, (n = 10) (Alphabets with same letters are non-significant at p = < 0.05).
Simplifiedly matching error performance with minimal distance (Remark 1), we state that among all alphabets with identical δ min 2, the UMP alphabets have the best performance ∀α ∈ ℂ.
In the other words, the performance of adaptive XC system cannot be better than of UMP alphabet if both are using alphabets with the same δ min 2. Remark 10.
Similar(47)
He had learned the alphabet with ease and could recite most of the books on his shelf.
Brandishing a pair of knives, she signs off for the last letter of the alphabet with a Zorro-like flourish.
It's a mixture of games and storytelling to explain the origins of the alphabet, with a visual style influenced by films like Metropolis and the original King Kong.
On a more modest note, Sue Grafton is merely working her way through the alphabet with Kinsey Millhone, private detective, one book at a time.
Mark Porter, chief executive and president of httprint, an online print service in San Francisco: "I call up my little girl and practice the alphabet with her.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com