Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(14)
For the CINS, which is a 20-item scale, we report only Cronbach's alpha (Table 1).
We analyzed the internal consistency of each emotion socialization strategy with Cronbach's alpha (Table 3, see also for descriptives).
In un-weighted cross-disability NASA-TLX, all scores lose reliability in terms of alpha (Table 10).
Bellows D is shortened at the maximum bending position, and is then extended by ( alpha ) Table 2 First prototype model's maximum length of bellows a for various applied pressures Pressure (kPa) Maximum length (mm) 5 320 10 345 15 375 20 385 theta = frac{{L_{2} - (L_{1} + alpha )}}{d}, (1) R = frac{{(L_{1} + alpha ) cdot d}}{{L_{2} - (L_{1} + alpha )}} + frac{d}{2}.
Similar results were observed in the ductal breast tumor subpopulation, where thirty tissues (62.5%) were positive for Estrogen Receptor alpha (Table 3A).
More importantly, seventy-one percent (15/21) of the ductal breast tumor tissues sub-population with both nuclear KLF6 distribution and ERBB2-overexpression also were positive for Estrogen Receptor alpha (Table 3B).
Similar(45)
Also, no changes in TNF-alpha (Table 1, #20) expression were observed in the CX.
This idea is further supported by our findings that CD14 and TNF-alpha (Table 1, #20) were both continuously upregulated only in the HC in the early and late phases of acute BM.
Interestingly, Btk and TNF-alpha (Table 1, #20) presented opposite transcriptional kinetics in the HC, i.e. while TNF-alpha mRNA levels progressively increased in the course of the disease, Btk mRNA levels decreased.
Relatively low Cronbach's alphas (Table 2) however were obtained for many of the domains (0.195 to 0.713).
The results generally suggested a good adjustment of the model ((χ 585) = 987.793; p < 0.001; χ/ddl = 1.68; RMSEA = 0.047; NFI = 0.91; SRMR = 0.070 ; NNFI = 0.96) Cronbach's alphas (Table 4) were acceptable overall in light of the number of items composing the subscales of the questionnaire (all were higher than 0.75, ranging from 0.76 to 0.91).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com