Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(3)
Almost the same argument can be seen in [9] by perturbing the system with maximum n limit cycles.
By Lemma 2.6, the reader could give the proof of Corollary 1.3 with almost the same argument as that in the proof of Theorem 1.2.
Hence, (1.2) has a T-periodic solution u R satisfying u R ∈ B R. Almost the same argument can be done for the case Σ = L.
Similar(56)
Following almost the same arguments as in previous case we may prove that (overline theta ^{varepsilon }_{n}) is continuous at (π n,t n,0).
Finally, the solution of (4.4) is given by P t ∗ μ, t ≥ 0. Proof In order to proof our result, we can follow almost the same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1.2 in [5] by Luigi Manca.
Employing almost exactly the same arguments as in the proof of Lemma 2.1, weconclude the results (2.20 - 2.22).
Applying almost exactly the same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1.1 in [22], we derive that equation (2.3) possesses a unique solution u m ∈ C ( 0, T ; L 1 ∩ W 1, 1 ( 0, T ; L 1.
Using results in [7, 20] and ψ ( x ) > 0 in Ω ¯, we can always assume m = min Ω ¯ ψ ( x ) > 0, M = max Ω ¯ ψ ( x ) > 0. Applying almost exactly the same arguments as in the proof of Lemma 5 in [21], we conclude to the following lemma.
John Updike (no friend of the nineteen-sixties) implicitly advanced the same argument, almost ten years ago, in his novel "Memories of the Ford Administration".
Every time a shooting happens, it's always the same argument: It's almost impossible to stop evil.
You could make the same argument about the coal industry.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com