Sentence examples for almost perfect interobserver from inspiring English sources

For vitreo retinal interface and inner choroid, there was perfect interobserver agreement; for outer choroid, there was substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement (kappa value of 0.71, 0.81, and 0.86 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) [[20]].

For vitreo retinal interface and inner choroid, there was perfect interobserver agreement, and for outer choroid, there was substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement (kappa value of 0.71, 0.81, and 0.86 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively).

Almost perfect interobserver correlation was found for all parameters (0.87).

The almost perfect interobserver agreement (>0.80) for the grading of stress fractures by both modalities emphasizes the robustness and reliability of the chosen, simplified grading systems [ 18].

Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.95) and interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.79).

After annotation, their intraobserver and interobserver correlations demonstrated almost perfect agreement and the relevant alarms comprised those that were technically true and indeterminable, but not those that were technically false.

Interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect (κ=0.53-1.00) for WB-DWI/MRI and slight to moderate (κ=0.04-0.52) for CT.

The ICCs for the intra- and interobserver reliability of the measurements were almost perfect (>0.9).

Interobserver agreement between the senior and routine pathologist was almost perfect (kappa 0.90; 95% CI 0.82 0.99) for determination of histologic type of differentiation, while it was only fair (kappa 0.37; 95% CI 0.25 0.49) in classification of tumour origin.

Interobserver reliability ranged from moderate (annular fissures: kappa = 0.54) to almost perfect (disc dessication: kappa = 0.84) [ 15].

The interobserver variability in evaluating the I-MIBG scans was "moderate" to "almost perfect", with median κ values for affected body segments and for form of metastases per body segment of 0.9 (0.7 1.0) and 0.5 (0.3 1.0), respectively in the European cohort, and of 0.9 (0.7 0.9) and 0.6 (0.3 0.8), respectively, in the COG cohort (for details see Supplementary Table  5).