The phrase "almost every analysis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the majority of analyses in a particular context, indicating that nearly all of them share a common characteristic or conclusion.
Example: "In the field of climate science, almost every analysis points to the urgent need for action to combat climate change."
Alternatives: "nearly all analyses" or "most analyses".
Almost every analysis of the decline in G.D.P. attributes it to a sharp fourth quarter reduction in defense spending, cuts that are scheduled to increase drastically under sequestration.
The first is to include, with almost every analysis of a discrete slum or shantytown, a genial profile of one of its residents.
Almost every analysis of the startup journey shows that risk adjusted, you are better of keeping that BigCo job.
In the immune system, our data suggest that CR may function via distinct, and perhaps entirely different, mechanism(s) from rapa, as CR and rapa exhibited contrasting effects in almost every analysis we performed.
Almost every data analysis raises new questions, which require the formulation of specific mechanistic hypotheses.
The public believes that the 2009 Obama stimulus plan was an abject failure, even though, according to almost every detached analysis, it created or saved millions of jobs.
Almost every German analysis of the subject opens with two observations: first, the right to equality is the most frequently cited right in the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court and, second, the equality doctrine is the area of constitutional law containing the greatest number of conundrums.
I will also have free analysis of almost every College game in the free analysis section at drbobsports.com.com
Strikingly, EpCAM emerged in the Oncomine outlier analysis of almost every investigated study (www.oncomine.org; outlier analysis identifies genes regulated in a subset of samples thus reflecting expression heterogeneity), indicating that there is a high overall heterogeneity of EpCAM expression within and across tissues.
But now physical anthropologists at the University of Pennsylvania, which owns Morton's collection, have remeasured the skulls, and in an article that does little to burnish Dr. Gould's reputation as a scholar, they conclude that almost every detail of his analysis is wrong.
The choice of a scenario building method was framed by the following characteristics of the subject under analysis: Almost every major aspect of our society was under scope: politics, economy, urbanization, energy, environment, demographics, climate change, consumer behaviour and technology were all central aspects to be considered.
