The phrase "allows writing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the capability or permission to write in a certain context, such as software features or rules.
Example: "This application allows writing in multiple languages, making it accessible to a wider audience."
Alternatives: "permits writing" or "facilitates writing".
VHDL-2008 provides a new naming feature, external names, that allows writing a testbench that accesses items not normally visible according to the hierarchical scope and visibility rules.
Subprograms in package declaration allows writing subprograms that implement useful operations and to call them from a number of different modules.
Visual basic for application (VBA) allows writing code that handles the many events that take place while working with Outlook information, such as creating new items or switching from one folder to another.
The definition of the single-phase Z-factor concept, applied to both the vapor and liquid reservoir phases, leads to: pV_{V} = n_{V} Z_{V} RT (46) pV_{L} = n_{L} Z_{L} RT (47 which, when applied to the overall two-phase system in terms of total volume (V = V V + V L ) and total moles (n = n V + n L ), allows writing: pV = nZ_{tp} RT (48 where Z tp is the concept of the two-phase Z-factor.
which can be written as A MNI × JKL = B × 1 Ψ 1 × 2 ( Ψ 2 ) T. with Ψ1=1 MN ⊗I I and Ψ 2 = I J ⊗ 1 KL T. Defining ( I 1, I 2 ) and ( R 1, R 2 ) as the sets of indices i n and r n associated respectively with the sets ( S 1, S 2 ) of index n, the formula (20) allows writing the element g r 1, …, r N of the core tensor as g r 1, …, r N = e R 1 G S 1 ; S 2 e R 2. (97).
Lingua::Romana::Perligata, for example, allows writing programs in Latin.
I feel the same way, not merely about sentences, but about allowing writing to take you someplace.
So there is a natural problem, found the world over: how quickly to allow writing to adapt to changes in the spoken language?
Here we establish sufficient conditions which allow writing sharp Kolmogorov type inequalities.
The tribunal will also allow written testimony by witnesses.
We observe that inherent politicised risks in water planning mean that current methods of public participation, such as information giving and allowing written submissions, are 'safer' and more easily managed.
