The phrase "allows for error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the possibility of mistakes or inaccuracies being tolerated in a process or system.
Example: "The design of the software allows for error, ensuring that users can recover from mistakes without losing their progress."
Alternatives: "permits mistakes" or "accommodates inaccuracies."
A market on the path to a $1B potential allows for error and time for real margins to develop.
Several features of this solution, though, are already prefigured in the Theaetetus, as we have seen: both the requirement that thought and speech be related only to what is, and the insight that the complexity of statements and beliefs allows for error to occur in the mismatch of the parts or the misapplication of one to the other.
We show that the receiver-oriented communication of TCP-Real (i) diminishes the impact of reverse path asymmetry on the transmission rate, (ii) allows for error recovery tactics that are responsive to the nature of the error detected (i.e. congestion versus bit corruption), and (iii) dictates transmission rate adjustments that conform to the level of present contention.
In addition, we have integrated REDCap's error detection and resolution features into a Data Query Quality Control system (DQCQ) that allows for error checks of varying complexity using SAS programs.
Among the defining features of self-assembly is that it proceeds via random molecular collisions between subunits (Pollard and Earnshaw, 2008) and that the process operates in a reversible (reversibility) and near-equilibrium manner that allows for error correction (Olson et al., 2007a; Whitesides et al., 1991).
"The complex process of creating annual reports allows for errors and distortions of various kinds to creep in, many of which are probably not intentional," said Alan J. Davis, director of tax communications for PricewaterhouseCoopers in Canada.
Also, because DNA carries information for a specific outcome, an error can occur as the mechanism operates to produce that outcome; hence Stegmann's account allows for errors and error-correcting mechanisms (such as proof reading mechanisms that correct DNA mutations).
This process, which began to be available in the late 1980s and early 1990s, can be much faster than the old cut-and-paste method for analog film, and it more easily allows for "errors" and changes.
In effect, the technique allows for errors on the predictor, as well as on the predicted variables.
In 2009, Kaufman co-edited a volume called "The Psychology of Creative Writing"; during that process, he became convinced that allowing for error — and realizing how nonlinear a process creativity can be — was an essential step for overcoming blocks in writing.
Asking how to alter the crude causal theory to allow for error is one place to begin looking for a more adequate proposal.
