The phrase "allows for deliberation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a situation or process that provides an opportunity for careful consideration or discussion.
Example: "The new policy allows for deliberation among team members before making a final decision."
Alternatives: "provides room for discussion" or "facilitates careful consideration."
Most frequently cited were multidisciplinary meetings in 'collaborations in midwifery and obstetrics' (verloskundige samenwerkingsverbanden), which allow for deliberation between community midwives and obstetrical caregivers regarding the organization of care and the care for specific pregnant women.
Our results suggest that when a structured process that allows for informed deliberation is conducted, cancer patients and their families are able and willing to explicitly discuss the burdensome costs of cancer care, the opportunity costs they pose, and their preferred benefit choices under the difficult circumstances they face.
But Hunter said administration officials asked him to slow down the process to allow for more deliberation.
Nonetheless, the sample sizes allowed for fulsome deliberation around a variety of inputs and opinions, and for active participation in "communicative processes and will formation" [ 27].
298, 303 (1998) ("[I]ntermediate scrutiny can be a form of judicial minimalism that can appropriately resolve [analogical] crises over time because it invites democratic deliberation, allows for moral evolution, promotes societal education, and provides judges with greater opportunities to consider the details....".). [100 ] Antonin Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. CHI.
Starting three months earlier than normal, the process allows for longer and more open deliberations.
This flexible approach allows for the rapid return of clear and serious health risk information, while providing for deliberation in less certain cases.
Morality allows for both types of considerations, as they pertain to different levels of moral deliberation.
Interfaces such as the UNFCCC Structured Expert Dialogue have evolved towards providing platforms by which information is exchanged between UNFCCC and IPCC in an iterative manner and in a more informal manner than international processes, which often emphasize negotiation rather than actual deliberation, usually allow for, as our interviews reveal.
Equity, egalitarian North South partnerships and the global conceptualization of health were operationalized by bringing in experts from multiple LMICs to participate in and lead peer review deliberations thus allowing for Southern perspectives to prevail.
