The phrase "allows for a conclusion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the implications or outcomes that can be drawn from a particular situation or set of data.
Example: "The evidence presented in the study allows for a conclusion that further research is necessary to validate the findings."
Alternatives: "enables a conclusion" or "permits a conclusion".
Also, wide confidence intervals around estimates for lumiracoxib did not allow for a conclusion on any of the outcomes in their analysis.
For example, HDAC1 has been implicated with AD, but the current data do not yet allow for a conclusion if inhibition of HDAC1 would be detrimental or beneficial for AD pathology.
However, a much more effective BP reduction on ACE inhibitors did not allow for a conclusion about whether this effect was specific for the ACE inhibitor therapy itself or merely reflected better control of arterial hypertension.
However, the small sample size does not allow for a conclusion as to whether these subjects represented boosting phenomena instead of recent conversion, even though it is not enough to definitively undermine importance of two step TST strategy in a different clinical context.
While the current study design does not allow for a conclusion on cause and effect regarding tail damage and body weight, the difference between tail bitten and control pigs in carcass weights supports previous results on a negative effect of being tail bitten on growth [ 5, 36].
The study of near misses, which occur in far greater numbers than maternal deaths, allows for a more robust quantification and conclusion on the risk factors and determinants of life – threatening complications [ 4, 7].
All three reviews reach similar conclusions that the results of available studies are heterogeneous and do not allow for a firm conclusion about the effectiveness of SAMe in the management of OA.
On the other hand, the wallettes reinforced with GFRP presented non-uniform results, which does not allow for a definitive conclusion over their mechanical behaviour: the wallettes treated with putty presented a compressive strength increasing of 5% and 21%, while those that did not received the putty presented a strength improvement of 17%and49%9%, as shown in Table 6.
Both inhibitors had a strong effect on the incidence of FACE, however possible differences in their targets as well as the observation that none of them could completely inhibit FACE, do not allow for a clear conclusion about the nature and localization of putative Ca2+ channels.
The few available results do not allow for a clear conclusion.
Therefore, the available limited information does not allow for a meaningful conclusion.
