The phrase "allowing contamination" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing processes, environments, or systems where contamination is permitted or not prevented.
Example: "The design of the facility is flawed, allowing contamination to spread throughout the production line."
Alternatives: "permitting contamination" or "facilitating contamination".
The proposed agreement interprets the regulations as allowing contamination levels more than nine times the level the state has deemed dangerous enough to require investigation.
The AP reported that Bramlage said the fracture in her left front ankle opened the skin, allowing contamination to set in, and at least one of her sesamoid bones was broken, too.
This may due to the emerging measures not allowing contamination and colonization.
These approaches have the benefit of allowing contamination levels to be estimated from relatively small sets of random sequences.
· processing must be done to high standards of hygiene and production control to avoid the risk of harming or even killing customers by allowing contamination of the products by foreign materials or the growth of food poisoning micro-organisms.
Inadequate identification of food safety hazards, poor control of the processing environment, and lapses in carrying out established procedures can lead to food safety failures, allowing contamination to occur during cheese manufacturing steps.
The conclusion was that sources of contamination could be identified and eliminated, allowing contamination-free assays to be conducted [ 36].
Reports of outbreaks associated with the use of needle-free valve connectors suggest 2 common risk factors: (1) poor adherence to disinfection practices before use and (2) a design that allows contamination when not in use.
"I don't see why the customer — in this case the E.U. — should accept a diktat from the seller to allow contamination with products that have not been approved as safe in Europe," a Greenpeace activist on agriculture issues, Marco Contiero, said.
The contamination "reflects a production or distribution process which allowed contamination with faecal material of human and/or animal origin," says the report.
Exactly how Kaplan can rule the judgment was obtained fraudulently and not allow contamination results, I don't know how to explain.
