Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

allowed to keep

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "allowed to keep" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing permission or entitlement to retain something, often in a legal or informal context. Example: "After the divorce, she was allowed to keep the family dog."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were allowed to keep their badges.

News & Media

The New York Times

Semenya was allowed to keep her medal.

They are allowed to keep $100.

News & Media

The New York Times

He should be allowed to keep it.

Why was Knight allowed to keep going?

He was allowed to keep the coin.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He was allowed to keep his winnings.

News & Media

The Guardian

Spitball pitchers were allowed to keep on with spitballs, however.

News & Media

The New Yorker

These companies are allowed to keep their draft filings confidential.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And he was allowed to keep his job.

News & Media

The New York Times

Even under Stalin, families were allowed to keep plots.

News & Media

The Economist
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "allowed to keep", ensure the context clearly establishes who granted the permission or authorization. Providing this clarity enhances the sentence's precision and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that being "allowed to keep" something implies ownership or unrestricted use. Permission may be conditional or temporary. Explicitly state any limitations on the permission granted to prevent misinterpretations.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "allowed to keep" functions as a passive construction indicating permission or authorization to retain possession of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. The numerous examples demonstrate its practical application across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "allowed to keep" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase signifying that someone has been granted permission or authorization to retain something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is widely applicable across various contexts, ranging from news and media to academic discussions. When using "allowed to keep", ensure clarity regarding who granted the permission and any limitations associated with it. Alternatives like "permitted to retain" or "authorized to hold" offer similar meanings but may convey different levels of formality. Its prevalence in authoritative sources underscores its reliability and versatility in both formal and informal communication.

FAQs

How can I use "allowed to keep" in a sentence?

You can use "allowed to keep" to describe a situation where someone has permission to retain something, such as "After the game, the children were allowed to keep the balloons they won."

What are some alternatives to "allowed to keep"?

Alternatives include "permitted to retain", "authorized to hold", or "entitled to keep", depending on the formality and context.

Is it correct to say "allowed keeping" instead of "allowed to keep"?

No, "allowed keeping" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is "allowed to keep", using the infinitive form of the verb.

What's the difference between "allowed to keep" and "forced to keep"?

"Allowed to keep" implies permission, while "forced to keep" implies obligation or compulsion. They have opposite meanings; one suggests a choice, and the other suggests a lack of choice.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: