The phrase "allowed executions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing legal or authorized actions, particularly in relation to capital punishment or similar scenarios.
Example: "The state has a policy regarding allowed executions, which outlines the procedures and conditions under which they may take place."
Alternatives: "permitted executions" or "authorized executions".
All outstanding death sentences were commuted to life imprisonment.In 1976, after that short lull, the court allowed executions to proceed again under redrafted state statutes.
The woman, Betty Lou Beets, was the fourth woman put to death in the United States since the Supreme Court allowed executions to resume in 1976.
And in New Hampshire, state lawmakers in May became the first to vote to abolish the death penalty since the Supreme Court allowed executions to resume in 1976.
When the Supreme Court allowed executions to resume, in 1976, after a four-year hiatus, the Justices mandated a two-phase structure for death-penalty trials that has become familiar in subsequent decades.
In 1972, the court struck down all existing death penalty statutes, but in 1976 allowed executions to resume under newly written laws that gave jurors more precise guidance in an effort to make death sentences less arbitrary.
A24 Move to Abolish Death Penalty The New Hampshire Legislature became the first in the nation to approve a bill banning capital punishment since the Supreme Court allowed executions to resume in 1976.
California allows executions for train wrecking and for perjury that leads to another's execution.
This followed Tennessee's decision to allow executions by electric chair if the execution drugs are unavailable or lethal injection is deemed unconstitutional.
Pope Francis has called for the worldwide abolition of the death penalty, urging Catholic leaders not to allow executions during the Church's Holy Year.
In a 1995 speech on what he called "the death penalty dialogue between law and social science," Professor Baldus considered what had led the Supreme Court to allow executions to proceed in the face of his study.
"Judge Fogel now has a clear directive from the high court that unless the new California protocol fails this 'sure or very likely' standard, he should allow executions to proceed," Mr. Scheidegger wrote.
