Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "allow for inconsistency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the acceptance or acknowledgment of variations or discrepancies in a particular context, such as rules, data, or behavior.
Example: "In our analysis, we must allow for inconsistency in the data due to varying measurement techniques."
Alternatives: "account for discrepancies" or "permit variations".
Exact(1)
This view would allow for inconsistency in moral reasoning since individuals may be hampered by their inability to consider different perspectives.
Similar(58)
A small gap was tolerated to allow for inconsistencies in reporting date on the two administrative systems.
The length of treatment during the 12-month follow-up period was measured in time in days from the first to the last dispatch, plus a 20% grace period (defined daily dose multiplied by 1.2) to allow for inconsistencies in patient adherence to therapy.
But if you add rules, they'll allow for inconsistencies in your cipher, which makes it harder to decode.
The software was customised and allowed for inconsistency checks of the data during entry.
28 Consistency between the different sources of evidence was explored statistically by comparing the fit of a model assuming consistency with a model which allowed for inconsistency.
Referencing the original questionnaires allowed for inconsistencies between the independent entries to be rectified.
The probabilistic approach allows for inconsistencies between records with missing matches i.e. it has the capacity to link records with errors in the linking fields.
28 We also included a random effect for treatment pair (that is, to separate those trials comparing different treatments types) in both models to allow for any inconsistency or "incoherence" in the model.
Ajax Translator, like Babel Fish, is useful for crude communication that translates one word at a time or that has the same grammatical structure in both language, but it does not allow for grammatical inconsistencies.
We lack a concrete explanation for this result, except saying that the error bars are generous enough to allow for such inconsistencies and that differences between observer scoring for continuous and binary could be due to possible unfamiliarity with the use of the continuous scale for Ki-67 (or counting tasks in general) despite our training process.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com