The phrase "allow for debate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic that is open to discussion or differing opinions.
Example: "The new policy is designed to allow for debate among stakeholders before any final decisions are made."
Alternatives: "permit discussion" or "facilitate dialogue".
John P. Feehery, a spokesman for Mr. Hastert, said, "This is the fairest way to allow for debate".
Should Yad Vashem, Israel's memorial to the murdered six million, be reconfigured to allow for "debate or dissent" about the Holocaust itself and Israeli domestic politics?
Mr. Gore's schedule did not coincide with Mrs. Clinton's during two days of campaigning in New York this week, though last night, after questions were raised about the issue, Mr. Gore's aides announced that an appearance with Mrs. Clinton that had been tentatively scheduled in Albany, but then dropped to allow for debate preparation, would take place.
The antagonism for Arendt is between rational truth and well-grounded opinion, since the former does not allow for debate and dissent, while the latter thrives on it.
I think the space we allow for debate in France is too narrow.
If one consequence of interaction is the interpretation of how to actualize human rights norms the interviews suggest that the flexibility and transparency of the Global Fund allow for debate about national responsibility including the difficult issue of disparities between states in terms of both ability and willingness to engage with their obligations.
That allows for debate and for solutions.
The framework presented decomposes a complex argument about risk management into component economic and statistical parts, allowing for debate and improved understanding over each element to inform the overall program in a transparent fashion.
While VoteIt is still holding back a bit on its features, Beery said that they're going after a dynamic realtime engagement by creating a voting process that mimics a live, real world vote, allowing for debate, presentation of evidence, and consensus building.
Members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee were the only ones allowed to offer amendments, and just two amendments were allowed for debate on the House floor.
9 Even allowing for debate over the interpretation of the outcomes of the Symplicity HTN-3 study, there is still a lack of evidence to support the routine use of RDN as a standard of care in RHTN.
