The phrase "allow for collective" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need to accommodate or consider a group or collective aspect in a situation or decision-making process.
Example: "The new policy will allow for collective input from all team members during the planning phase."
Alternatives: "permit group" or "facilitate collective".
Instead, he opted to introduce new legislation that reinterprets the constitution to allow for collective self-defence.
They also allow for collective defence as anyone who has attempted to walk amid the shrieking calls and dive bombing of a colony of ground-nesting birds can attest.
His decision in July to reinterpret Japan's pacifist constitution to allow for "collective self-defence", in other words for Japan to help its allies should they be attacked, has not helped either.In this section A strenuous September Saturation point Unwelcome change Great expectations Passing the torch ReprintsPressure from the right is already growing.
So Mr Abe, backed by the panel, has a narrower goal: reinterpreting the constitution in ways that, for the first time, allow for "collective self-defence"—that is, would let Japan aid its allies, notably America, should they come under attack.The recommendations stop far short of allowing combat missions overseas.
Recognizing that irresponsibility in science and innovation is a derivative of the innovation ecosystem it originates from, RRI practices of the first category aim at opening up the science and innovation process to a wider range of voices to allow for collective learning among the different stakeholders.
Physical spaces where marginalized voices are elevated and art is shared allow for collective healing.
Connecticut enacted a law in 1977 that prohibited public employees, who included workers at state-run institutions, from striking, but allowed for collective bargaining.
But Gonzalez's law exploits an exemption in anti-trust law that allows for collective bargaining if, her office said, a state "proactively provides them a legal framework".
The claim, led by former financial services ombudsman Walter Merricks – who has instructed US-based law firm Quinn Emanuel, is to be filed under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which allows for collective damages claims.
Consumer groups have also voiced unhappiness that the government has not taken up another GDPR provision that allows for collective redress for victims of data breaches.
Consumer groups have also voiced unhappiness that the government has not taken up another GDPR provision that allows for collective redress for victims of data breaches.
