The phrase "allow for a conclusion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the implications or outcomes of a particular argument or situation, indicating that something provides the basis for reaching a conclusion.
Example: "The evidence presented in the study allows for a conclusion that further research is necessary to validate the findings."
Alternatives: "lead to a conclusion" or "permit a conclusion".
Also, wide confidence intervals around estimates for lumiracoxib did not allow for a conclusion on any of the outcomes in their analysis.
However, a much more effective BP reduction on ACE inhibitors did not allow for a conclusion about whether this effect was specific for the ACE inhibitor therapy itself or merely reflected better control of arterial hypertension.
For example, HDAC1 has been implicated with AD, but the current data do not yet allow for a conclusion if inhibition of HDAC1 would be detrimental or beneficial for AD pathology.
While the current study design does not allow for a conclusion on cause and effect regarding tail damage and body weight, the difference between tail bitten and control pigs in carcass weights supports previous results on a negative effect of being tail bitten on growth [ 5, 36].
However, the small sample size does not allow for a conclusion as to whether these subjects represented boosting phenomena instead of recent conversion, even though it is not enough to definitively undermine importance of two step TST strategy in a different clinical context.
All three reviews reach similar conclusions that the results of available studies are heterogeneous and do not allow for a firm conclusion about the effectiveness of SAMe in the management of OA.
On the other hand, the wallettes reinforced with GFRP presented non-uniform results, which does not allow for a definitive conclusion over their mechanical behaviour: the wallettes treated with putty presented a compressive strength increasing of 5% and 21%, while those that did not received the putty presented a strength improvement of 17%and49%9%, as shown in Table 6.
Both inhibitors had a strong effect on the incidence of FACE, however possible differences in their targets as well as the observation that none of them could completely inhibit FACE, do not allow for a clear conclusion about the nature and localization of putative Ca2+ channels.
The few available results do not allow for a clear conclusion.
Therefore, the available limited information does not allow for a meaningful conclusion.
The number of patients is too small to allow for a final conclusion.
